BIOCHAR may not be the miracle soil additive that many farmers and researchers hoped it to be, according to a new study by the University of Illinois in the United States.
Biochar may boost the agricultural yield of some soils – especially poor quality ones – but there is no consensus on its effectiveness.
Researchers tested different soils’ responses to multiple biochar types and were unable to verify their ability to increase plant growth.
However, the study did show biochar’s ability to affect soil greenhouse gas emissions.
Biochar additives – particles of organic material burned in a controlled oxygen-free process – provide soil with a form of carbon that is more resistant to microbial action than traditional, uncharred biomass additives.
“There are conflicting reports on the effectiveness of biochar for use to increase crop production as well as its potential as a carbon-storage reservoir,” Illinois Sustainable Technology Center researcher and study co-author, Nancy Holm, said.
“We came into this study suspecting that variations in types of biochar feedstock, preparation methods and soil composition were the cause of the conflicting results.”
Addressing past research inconsistencies, the team designed a systematic study using 10 common Illinois soil types to test the effects of mixing in varying concentrations of biochars from three different feedstocks – corn, Miscanthus and hardwood.
To add a dimension to the study that is common in real-world agricultural settings, the team also examined how two other sources of carbon – plant material burned in an uncontrolled open-atmosphere setting and corn stover – affect soils. Corn stover is composed of raw stalks, leaves and cobs that remain in the field after harvest.
Factoring in each scenario, triplicate analysis and control samples, the experiment produced 429 soil samples in which the researchers planted two corn seeds each.
After a 14-day germination period, the study showed that adding biochar from any of the feedstocks or production techniques had no substantial influence on the output of greenhouse gas production, plant growth dynamics or microbial community activity.
However, the researchers did see some important differences in the soils that included corn stover and burnt plant material.
“The addition of corn stover – which simulates actual field conditions – led to a dramatic increase in greenhouse gas emissions, as well as a change in the soil microbial community,” ISTC researcher and lead author of the study, Elizabeth Meschewski, said.
“But, initial seedling growth was not affected when comparing these results to the soils with no additives. Addition of burnt plant material did show reduced plant biomass above ground, increased production of the greenhouse gas nitrogen oxide and altered soil microbial community.”
The team concluded that biochar might improve the quality of highly degraded or poor quality soils, but does not appear to provide any quality benefit to the soils used in this study.
However, the researchers said that using biochar as an additive instead of raw biomass or burnt plant material could prevent microbe-generated greenhouse gas emissions.
The team acknowledges that a longer-period study is needed for a more comprehensive understanding of how biochar may benefit agriculture.
“For future studies, we recommend performing a similar study in many different soil types for the whole growing season for corn – not just 14 days – and possibly over several growing seasons,” ISTC researcher and study co-author B.K. Sharma said.
Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The new findings are published in the journal Chemosphere.
The paper “Pyrolysis biochar has negligible effects on soil greenhouse gas production, microbial communities, plant germination, and initial seedling growth” is available here and from the University of Illinois News Bureau. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.031